1
Tu
75
(18)
the Thomas A. Scott decided. in the United States District Court of Admiralty by Judge Shipman-
aait for salvag
It was
agamet a Vessel, which though Prot commissioned in the of the United States, war Farz owned, manned, supplied, and armed by the forecament. In that case the learned Judge after resetuning all the English authorities on th subject, refused to entertain the ait. it having been shown that the Nasel was "exclusively owned by the Sovereign Power!
these
The result then of these be, decisios would that, although the case f the- Prins Frederike, Lord Stowell appears to have entertained some doubt whether the Court in fact might not under certani circumstances enforce its jurisdiction crew aganist a thips of War, it has "been established by entregrant decisions.
{
AUD
1
Tu
75
(18)
the Thomas A. Scott decided. in the United States District Court
of a
Admiralty by Judge Shipoma-
aait for salvag
It was
agamet a Vessel, which though Prot commissioned in the
of the United States, war Farz
owned,
manned, supplied, and armed
by the forecament. In that care the learned Judge after resetuning all the English authorities on th subject, refused to entertain the ait. it having been shown that the Nasel was "exclusively owned by the Sovereign Power !
these
The result then of these be,
decisios
would
that, although
the case
f
the-
Prins Frederike, Lord Stowell appears
to have entertained
some doubt
whether the Court in fact might not under certani circumstances
enforce its jurisdiction crew aganist a thips of War, it has "been established by entregrant
decisions.
{
AUD
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.